反抗军

法西斯，共产主义，资本主义，有区别吗？在利益面前都是可以划等号的。俄罗斯游击队歧视犹太人，在军队里有等级，关键的时候，解除同盟关系，一跑了之！这就是俄罗斯游击队干的事情！所以看我们现在的国际关系，俄罗斯依然是个不值得信任的民族！！！我们国家随时都会被出卖！

The history of Belorussia in World War II is largely ignored at best. Given that, it has become so much harder to depict the story of the Bielski Partisans on the big screen. Only the fact is clear: that the Bielski brothers managed to save over 1,200 Jewish people by hiding in the Nalibocka forest from the mean war machine of the Nazis. What the Partisans did was hardly imaginable today, and may involve some extreme moral challenges that cannot be pictured without causing a emotional discomfort of the audiences.

Good for the director Edward Zwick, he did not mean to compare the Bielskis with Steven Spielberg’s German Righteous among the Nations Oskar Schindler, nor did he want to produce a sentimental and moving epic as Schindler’s List. He was very clear about the idea of the picture when he set out to make it: to tell a story about how Jewish people defy their fate of being slaughtered, not that about their being killed and rescued by Germans.

The story-telling may not be a tour de force like that of Schindler’s List, nor does the film has a nemesis character like Amon Goeth, yet the viewing pleasure is not reduced. As always, Edward Zwick did not insert a stereotype evil character into his film, but throw us directly into the historical and ethnic environment of the movie’s settings, and reveal layers and layers of conflicts. Again in this movie he managed to depict complex interaction between multitudes of humanity and a dramatic age full of overwhelming events, while keeping the audiences’ fist clenched and them sitting at the edge of the chair.

A central conflict in this movie is brought to the face of our protagonists by their very purpose: to survive and defy the fate that has descended on their nation. In the huge, all-devouring grinder of the war, to escape being victims, the only way is to become the ones who impose destruction on the enemies. This brings the fundamental conflict into play: to what extent can one gain power while sustaining empathy and humanity. All the other conflicts, such as those between Jewish combatant and non-combatant, and between Jewish and German people, are all developed around the fundamental conflict. These conflicts work as prisms, which refract multiple facets of human nature, which makes the landscape of war more alive and more realistic. The behaviours of the groups of Jew is no longer innocent or morally perfect as some other war movies depicted, but are convincing and arousing compassion.

The director has done a good job telling a story of people in desperate conditions, and was greatly helped by a group of great actors, although many of them are not famous. Although not without caveats, in most part the acting is natural and compelling. You would feel that those are really Jewish people in that time, beaten-up, self-preserving, yet willing to fight beside their charismatic leader. Being often seeing real-life Jewish people, I thought Daniel Craig was too British to act as a Jewish leader, but he really brings out the leader’s spirit. Yet in some action scenes he still reminds me of Bond.

Although the story can well be adapted into a high profile action movie, or at least an epic movie with the excitement of Last Samurai, Zwick has chosen to reflect the day-to-day struggle and sacrifice in the forest, this may make the movie less a block buster, but surely is not a bad thing if we consider its values in preserving a piece of forgotten history. Although there are some inconsistency in the plot, and the first half was a bit slow, Defiance is nevertheless one of the best movies depicting the brave struggles in WWII.

很感动。是部好片子。战争真是人性有利的拷问器。是把敌人当石头一样报复，还是当共同生活在地球上的同类来宽容？这个问题就是老大和老二的分歧，也是剧情探索的一个问题，于是有了一个浴血奋战的场景和人们欢呼庆祝婚礼的对比。很让人难忘的一个比对。

是在困境中寻求庇护，还是保持对家庭的忠贞？显然，在不寻常的境遇中，女人的求生本能让她们选择了改变。在战争中，和平时代的阶级分层被打破了，这是一个有趣的事情，英雄的三兄弟获得了平日根本无法被看一眼的女人的青睐。

影片中蕴含着成长的主题，排行最小的老四看到了死亡，从被惊骇的儿童成长为能抓获德军的战斗者，老三从小兵成长为紧急关头能够做出重要决策并带领大家继续前行的领导者。

影片最后，他们所带领的幸存者的后代有了上万人，这句话让我再次稀里哗啦，他们不是诺贝儿和平奖获得者，他们不是飞扬跋扈的将军，他们不是谈笑间灰飞烟灭的政治家，他们在历史中很普通，却又伟大得超越了一切。

残忍的纳粹党··残忍的杀戮，使犹太人陷入水深火热
先不谈种族灭绝，狭义上讲，每个人朝不保夕，不知道谁下一秒就倒在德国大兵的枪下
于是，开始逃亡
开始树林里的新生活，在Tuvia的带领下
他们管这个叫community,我看，那才是真正意义上的communist.
而片中的所谓苏联红军，本应是真正的共产主义战士，可是怎么样，跟军阀有什么区别？他们中的officer甚至是反犹太的代表，只是因为一名犹太人，他们的同志，用了一下officer专用的厕所，就被暴打···
我印象中，或者说我们从小到大被灌输的关于共产主义战士的概念是，无私，伟大，牺牲精神，这些，在片中的苏联红军上，我却没有看到一点点。
而相反的，在那个community面，没有懒惰，没有无所事事，没有不劳而获
每个人的所得都是一样多，不管你是战士，还是妇女老幼，即使是领导者，也没有想过多拿一丁点儿
讽刺
再说欲望
当人们刚刚逃到树林，相对安全，人的原始欲望抬头了
大家都结成一对一对的所谓树林夫妻，呵呵，如此危险，如此凄惨的境地下，大家还是很“乐观”的享受
讽刺
勇敢的Aaron抓到一个德国兵，送信儿的吧，把他带回了树林
犹太人们疯狂了
这个德国兵在用大部分人都听不懂的语言喊叫着，可是根本没人理会
犹太人有的只是愤怒，愤怒。
他在说他有老婆和两个孩子，一声近乎撕裂的So did I彻底激起了所有犹太人的愤怒
他们要报仇
女人们叫喊着自己被残害的孩子的名字
男人们想的是自己的父母，妻子，他们没有一个活下来
所有人叫嚷着，我们要justice，片子中翻译的是审判。我们要审判。个人认为，译为平等对待比较好，纳粹是邪恶的，要把犹太，这个他们口中的“劣等民族”赶尽杀绝，这时候，谁来给无辜的犹太人一个公道？凭什么？
犹太人疯狂的在那个德国兵身上发泄，发泄失去亲人，朋友的痛苦与悲愤。Tuvia看来想阻止眼前“残忍”的一幕，可是当他听到犹太人发自内心的哭喊，他掉头走掉了。眼前的一幕再残忍，有纳粹的滔天恶行更令人发指么？他们应该付出代价，早晚。
德国人开始进攻树林，他们组织反抗以及撤退。怎么有点像中国的二万五千里长征，同样，他们做到了
正规军和游击队还就是有差距，没有弟弟回来支援，这场反抗的结果，谁知道
他们活下来了
三兄弟中一人阵亡，另外两人过上了普通人的生活。真好
真实的故事，感人的犹太式温柔，少见的描写集体力量的美国片

我的体会：这部电影里，看到了一个原本孤立于众人之外的犹太群体，如何在受到残酷迫害后，慢慢学着团结。学会在面对禽兽般的暴力时，保持住人性，不让自己变为禽兽。昨天@王媛 老师说“爱自己”——这部电影讲的就是爱自己，保持人的尊严。
电影第一男主角图维亚读书成绩并不好，这群难民里有他的老师，一个高雅的知识分子。但是面对残暴的纳粹，面对血淋林的屠戮，老师的信念几乎崩溃了。最后，老师在长途奔袭中去世，去世前对自己的学生说：我几乎都失去了自己的信念，但是你让我重拾了信念。
图维亚作为这样一群由各色人组成的犹太难民，面对来自兄弟的挑战，面对群里奸诈之辈的挑战时，都显示出了力挽狂澜的英雄本色，真仿佛摩西重现。但是，在一次大轰炸后，他几乎失去了听力，意识也模糊了不少，这时遇到一条大河，他的坚定意志开始犹豫，他以为遇到了绝路，几乎放弃了求生的意志。这时，受到他数次激励的小弟弟亚赛头脑变得清醒，鼓励众人解下腰带，拧成绳子，老老少少把绳子系在腰上，趟过了大河，求生成功。

我在这部电影里看到了领导力的真实体现，看到了一个原本松散的群体能够健康发展，需要怎样的理念和行为。这部电影又多么像创业者将走过的路：留下是死，走出去也可能是死，但也可能是活。to be or not to be。

这部电影，和《逃离索比堡》一样，会成为我记忆中排名前五的二战影片。

人如何能知道自己为什么战斗，而且如此坚定的坚持，非硝烟的生活可能更难明白这些，一贯喜欢坚韧的故事，尤其喜欢镜头的运用，人物肖像照的经典案例，婚礼那场也经典的美丽，大光比的人物面部用光，肖像轮廓光运用也相当老到……