手术室的故事第四季

反抗的美学。如果说古典主义被定义为对激情的控制，古典时代就是一个艺术将当代人的激情作为形式和程式来表达的时代。今天集体的激情超过个人的激情，艺术不需要控制爱，而是在其最纯粹的意义上的政治。人被一种对其处境的希望或绝望的激情所控制。 然而，这是一项多么艰巨的任务——1）因为要体验一种激情先要表达它，集体的激情吞噬了艺术家所有的时间；2）因为死亡的机会更多——甚至这是真正地体验集体激情的唯一机会，即愿意为它而死。因此，真实性最大的机会同时也是艺术最大的失败的机会。看来古典主义也许是不可能的。如果它是不可能的，事实上人类反抗的历史就有了一种意义，这种意义是导致这种局限性。黑格尔可能有道理，历史的终结是不可想象的，它只能存在于一种失败之中。黑格尔这里可能错了。但是，如我们似乎相信的，如果这种古典主义是可能的，至少人们可以看到它只能由一代人创造出来——而非一个人。换句话说，我所说的失败的机会只能由数量加以平衡，就是说，十个真正的艺术家有一个存活下来，能够在他的生活中发现激情的时间和创造的时间。艺术家不能再是一个孤独者了。或者，如果他是一个孤独者，那是得益于整整一代人的胜利。 ＊＊＊1945年10月 反抗的美学。 人不可能完全绝望。结论：所有的绝望的文学都只是一个有局限性的个案，并非最具象征性。在人身上最值得注意的并非他是绝望的，而是他克服或忘记绝望。——绝望的文学永远不是普世的。——普世的文学不可能止步于绝望（也不会止步于乐观主义——倒过来推理就足够了），它只需考虑这一点。需要补充：文学是普世的或不是之理由。 ＊＊＊反抗的美学。宏伟的风格和美丽的形式，是最高级的反抗的表达。

以上摘自《加缪笔记》

这段太太太契合《使女的故事》了

看了第四季的前三集之后重读了一遍《证言》，由于阿特伍德对于剧集编剧的参与度很高，《证言》的后记中也写到这一点，所以最终剧集的结果应该是会与《证言》时代或者前《证言》时代的事件相吻合，据此推论一些剧集情节的发展。

（以下严重剧透《证言》小说内容）

《证言》的时间设置在《使女的故事》之后十五年（标志性时间点是妮可宝宝十六岁生日）。当时国际社会已经和基列国基本上达成了和平，加拿大有基列的领事馆，持有基列护照的珍珠女孩可以以类似于外交人员的身份出入加拿大领土。在外交压力下，加拿大曾答应送还妮可宝宝，但宝宝“失踪”了。五月天被认定为恐怖组织，不能公开活动，但有系统性接待逃亡使女的地下网络（可能雏形就是剧集中出现的基金会）。妮可宝宝隐匿身份后，在为五月天工作的养父母的养育下，在加拿大自由空气环境中，成长为独立自信勇敢富有正义感（也有一点点小叛逆）的青少年，并在发生变故时极其勇敢地承担了前往基列获取情报的任务。

《证言》结尾提到“母亲与两位父亲”都来到了加拿大，并且妮可的父亲一直能获得她成长中的照片。所以作为妮可宝宝父亲的Nick应该还是去了加拿大的，只是不清楚时间和方式。剧集中已经当上了大主教的他会以什么形式反水呢，又或者剧集在这里会不按照书里发展？（毕竟书里只是提了一句，没写很多）这个人物蛮有潜力可挖的，不搞点大动作有点可惜，但现在剧集的预告里似乎没他多少镜头啊。

而June肯定在更早的时间去了加拿大（第四季的长预告中显示了她身穿正常社会的衣服而非使女服，站在演讲台上呼吁的镜头）。《证言》书中，June的形象一开始主要是以传说形式出现，后来提到她成为了情报人员，长期活跃在对抗基列的前线。第四季前三集中表现出的下毒刺杀前往芝加哥前线的基列军队高官等内容，可能是她后来从事生涯的一个开端？

目前剧集中表现出来的Aunt Lydia总体上还是个完全相信自己所作所为是为了这些姑娘们好，也信奉基列体制的忠犬。与书中那个一方面在基列系统中获得了身为女性可能的最高地位，甚至获得了塑像和画像的地位，另一方面成为了五月天在基列内部最高级别的线人，长期提供顶级机密情报，甚至最后送出了致命一击的角色，还相去甚远。不知道是不是会在剧集中展现转变过程。如果可能（且观众也有兴趣）的话，那还挺有意思的。

直到《证言》的时代，Hannah还生活在基列，作为大主教的女儿Agnes长大。也就是说June离开时没能成功地把大女儿带出去。书中并没有写到（第四季第三集里）她在记事后见到过亲生母亲的那段故事。

从第一季的九万+评论，到第四季的九千

观众不是想一直要爽，也没有想要虐，过瘾

观众只是想要像第一季一样没有商业价值 ，没有政治左右，不在乎外界目光拍出来的剧

而现在 她火了，阻碍太多了，站在闪光灯下，编剧不再是一个人的脑洞，认知

从第三季开始就有人说受够了女主一个人的慢镜头，迟缓，对啊，明明生死攸关，明明那么多现实的阴影在，可剧里越来越像女主一个人的舞台

充满了太多政治正确了。观众不敢大胆，编剧也不敢了，打分没有不诚实，现在得分完全依靠了前两季的光辉

问一个问题，女人不是做男权的奴隶就是做母性的奴隶么？

敢不敢撕破这个母性的光辉斗篷 敢不敢先做自己再做母亲

母性没有那么伟大 不是没有孩子活不了

女人也会自私 也会有自我 ok？ do u understand ????

为什么看了第四季第一集感觉跟我之前第3季最后的剧情连不起来，记得之前是把他两个孩子送出基列国，然后带其他使女逃出去，然后有人追杀他们，好像还有跟大boss逃出去，那对夫妻被加拿大zf抓走了，第四季开始怎么换了个女主人在管他们了，难道是2年没看忘记剧情了吗，求解释啊啊啊啊啊啊啊啊啊啊啊啊啊啊啊啊啊啊啊啊啊啊

Hulu's dystopian drama delivers on some long-delayed promises, but ultimately it's too little, too late.

When last I saw June Osbourne on The Handmaid's Tale, she was being carried off the battlefield, gaze turned heavenward, whisper-praying Exodus 3:7 in voiceover — a red-draped savior prepared for martyrdom. Not-at-all-a-spoiler alert: June did not die. Elisabeth Moss is on the poster, after all. Also, killing June would qualify as "something actually happening," and that's not how this show rolls — at least, not for the last two seasons. Since 2018, June's story hasn't advanced much at all: She is forever fleeing Gilead, forever witnessing and enduring physical and psychological torture, forever staring into the middle distance — jaw set and eyes ablaze with rage and agony — determined to keep on keepin' on.

Having successfully delivered a plane full of Gilead's children to Canada, June and her fellow renegade handmaids are hiding from the Eyes, hoping to hook up with the underground resistance movement known as Mayday. People around June keep suffering, getting hurt, dying — and her peers are starting to get real tired of it. "Fuck June Osbourne," grouses one Martha, when Commander Nick Blaine, June's forbidden love, asks for help finding her. "Everyone that helps her ends up on the fucking wall." Or shot, or pushed off a building, or flattened by an oncoming vehicle.

Even some of June's ride-or-die sisters are losing their patience. "You're so bossy and judgmental!" snaps Janine. "You need to stop trying to save me to make yourself feel better." Up in Canada, Moira and Emily struggle to find homes for the freed Gilead children, who are understandably traumatized by their sudden relocation. "That's what she does," gripes Moira of June. "Takes the big swing and f--- the consequences!" Even our heroine, after one particularly grueling series of torture sessions, has a hard time keeping her heart in the fight. "I'm ready… for it all to be over," she whispers. "I'm ready. Please, just kill me." No such luck, ma'am. We're in it for the long haul.

It's validating, seeing characters speak the frustrations that many viewers feel about June's stagnant journey. The quality of Handmaid's Tale isn't suffering because the political climate in America has changed; a woman's lack of autonomy over her own body is, unfortunately, an evergreen subject. It's suffering because Miller and company have become so enraptured by the show's grandly executed atmosphere of prestige misery — used to stunning, Emmy-winning effect in season 1 — that they've started mistaking garden-variety brutality for brutal truths. Revolutions take time, but they also evolve. The Handmaid's Tale is stuck in the crisis stage.

This season does offer a few rare notes of freshness. There's a glimpse into Janine's pre-Gilead life as a single mom. Amanda Brugel gets more screen time as Rita, the escaped Martha adjusting to a life of freedom in Canada. McKenna Grace pops up for a memorable turn as a tyrannical child bride. Aunt Lydia gets her steps in on a treadmill.

New things, things I've waited for, start to happen in episode 6. A few of these moments are genuinely cathartic and moving, but others feel underplayed and dulled by such a long delay. Meanwhile, an implausible development with Serena Joyand Fred Waterford— awaiting trial in Canada for their crimes against humanity — seems to be setting up another familiar showdown. As for Aunt Lydia, her bewildering new alliance with Commander Lawrence feels forced, a writers' device to keep their brand-name actors busy.

If you're still watching The Handmaid's Tale — heck, if you're still reading this review — you've probably resigned yourself to seeing June's saga through to the end. Can the show deliver on a true second act, justifying the decision to keep the story going so far past Margaret Atwood's novel? I'll likely have to wait until season 5 to find out. Grade: C+

It's a blessed day, "Handmaid's" fans! Or perhaps a blessed night? After a 21-month break, your show is finally back, but it's still kind of hard to tell the difference between night and day. Does the sun in fact ever shine in Gilead, or is there permanent overcast — a pall that hangs over lives, fates,motives,storylines and plots?

Post-apocalyptic worlds aren't supposed to be bright, sunlit places, least of all "Handmaid's," yet this season does seem to be the darkest one yet, June's ordeal too. One indignity and horror follows the next. She is debased, ground into the dust, then she rises and falls again, only to repeat the cycle all over. But neither bullets nor Aunt Lydia can stop her, and as we all know so well, that which doesn't kill her will make her stronger. June gets stronger.

In fact, "Handmaid's" continues to insist in the credits that this is "based" on the Margaret Atwood novel (which was effectively wrapped up by the end of the first season), but the series is now mostly just based on a familiar arc. The titanic showdown is coming, when June will face her foes just as surely as Batman had to face Ra's al Ghul or Bane. The destiny of superheroes is always tied to that of supervillains. June's destiny still awaits her, awaits them, and there will be blood.

In the meantime, there's not a whole lot of pleasure to be had in the waiting. June's ordeal has now started to feel like my ordeal. I need to have it resolved as much as she does. but like her, don't have any choice in the matter because I'm invested too. I've gone down the hole this far. Surely there is light at the end of this tunnel? Maybe I'll get stronger too if the show doesn't kill me first.

国际法庭帮不了你，援助组织力量微弱，即便是经历过逃出来的一些受害者也一副let go，往前走的意思。June却没办法忘记，那些牺牲的女人，那些受困的孩子，那些曾经的伤痛。 黑化这个词不准确，这是反抗者的觉醒，我钦佩她的勇气。这个我们中国人太有同感了，起来，不愿做奴隶的人们，期待别人主持正义是傻子，忘记过去继续新的生活是自私、胆小，我不原谅，因为那不容原谅